<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raising an Activity Centre – A Modern City’s Guide to Parenthood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pracsys.com.au/raising-an-activity-centre-%e2%80%93-a-modern-city%e2%80%99s-guide-to-parenthood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pracsys.com.au/raising-an-activity-centre-%e2%80%93-a-modern-city%e2%80%99s-guide-to-parenthood/</link>
	<description>Making Australia a Better Place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bludger of Wanneroo</title>
		<link>http://pracsys.com.au/raising-an-activity-centre-%e2%80%93-a-modern-city%e2%80%99s-guide-to-parenthood/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bludger of Wanneroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pracsys.com.au/?p=441#comment-333</guid>
		<description>The metaphor of maturing works well for me, and the descriptions of the stages of maturity are good.  But what&#039;s lacking to me - and to extend the metaphor - is the &#039;nature versus nurture&#039; question.  Is it enough to presume that a centre will mature organically (i.e. by nature alone)?  Or should we be taking a more active involvement throughout (particularly at the start) to help determine the eventual outcome. I believe that we are lacking &#039;nurture&#039; in our planning and development - in other words just letting Centres evolve organically.  Whilst this may lead to the same ultimate outcome, I would argue that this is not necessarily the case and it is by no means the most efficient or desirable outcome.  Equivalent to the liberal parents who do nothing to curb the excesses of youth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The metaphor of maturing works well for me, and the descriptions of the stages of maturity are good.  But what&#8217;s lacking to me &#8211; and to extend the metaphor &#8211; is the &#8216;nature versus nurture&#8217; question.  Is it enough to presume that a centre will mature organically (i.e. by nature alone)?  Or should we be taking a more active involvement throughout (particularly at the start) to help determine the eventual outcome. I believe that we are lacking &#8216;nurture&#8217; in our planning and development &#8211; in other words just letting Centres evolve organically.  Whilst this may lead to the same ultimate outcome, I would argue that this is not necessarily the case and it is by no means the most efficient or desirable outcome.  Equivalent to the liberal parents who do nothing to curb the excesses of youth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forex robot</title>
		<link>http://pracsys.com.au/raising-an-activity-centre-%e2%80%93-a-modern-city%e2%80%99s-guide-to-parenthood/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>forex robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pracsys.com.au/?p=441#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Amazing as always :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing as always <img src='http://pracsys.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
