Posts Tagged ‘planning’


Don’t develop in isolation

Having access to land for a development or precinct is one thing; knowing what to do with it is a whole other ball game.

It is not simply a case of “build it and they will come”. If it is not planned correctly from the beginning, a development can quickly become a costly white elephant.

Pracsys is undertaking the economic analysis of a site next to the Mandurah train station which Landcorp would like to buy and develop over the next 10 years.

A transit orientated development (TOD) is directly impacted by transport, but there are broader issues than the traffic passing through. The fact that people are coming and going from an area does not necessarily make it a viable concern.

Planners need to determine what the site can bear in terms of residential development and, therefore, commercial and retail.

 The relationship between retail and residential development is relatively straightforward: the former is generally driven by the latter. Less clear is the relationship between residential and commercial space.

It is pointless to park a lot of commercial floor space without understanding what it would mean to the immediate area and surrounding region. How much commercial floor space is currently available, what is it used for and how functional is it?

land-development

The viability of a new precinct needs to be examined within this context. What would the development add to the area? Who will be attracted to it, what can it support and what will drive demand? How would it be connected to other precincts in the region?

There must be a specific strategy in place to ensure the viability of any development before a sod is turned. The number one lesson is: Don’t develop in isolation.


Planning change for the better

Anyone familiar with the classic Westerns knows that when the big guns come riding into town, that town is in for a real shake-up. Whatever the outcome of the inevitable shootout, come sun-up life will have fundamentally changed.

Things might be a little more civilised in 21st century Western Australia, but outsiders can still wreak havoc if townsfolk are not prepared for the onslaught of change. 

Broome is a town at the crossroads after the State Government announced James Price Point, 60km north of the tourist hotspot, as the site for the Kimberley liquefied natural gas (LNG) hub. 

As big guns go, this is right up there — a multi-billion dollar driver industry that will have a profound impact on the communities of the Kimberley, and Broome in particular. Just how these communities emerge when the construction stage dust has settled depends on the planning for the arrival. Town planners and policy makers cannot be reactive, they must be proactive.

There is no doubt that with such a major piece of infrastructure on its doorstep Broome will experience a massive demographic change. The nature of the project attracts a far more diverse workforce than is currently the case. The industry and employment base  of the town will expand substantial, as will the resident population with the incoming people likely to expect more particular lifestyle options and amenity levels than has been the case up to this point.

Some town planners tend to think, ‘well, have we got enough land to cater for this influx of workers’, and once they’ve sorted where they’re going to put them, and whether the utilities are adequate, they move on. 

But land is only part of the equation. If a town like Broome is to profit from the arrival of the big guns it is essential to adopt an integrated planning strategy that considers everything from the changing employment base and residential requirements to environmental sustainability.

The scale of this project will position Broome as the major centre of the Kimberley  well into the future, but only if the planning is done properly. For lessons in how not to do it, planners, governments and community leaders need only look a little further south, to the Pilbara town of Karratha.Karratha is dominated by the resources sector, indeed it is the reason for its existence, but the general planning for the town across the board has tended to be reactive and ad hoc. One of the negative results of this approach is the fact that the tourism sector in Karratha is virtually non-existent, a situation that will take a long time to rectify.

And Broome has more to lose. It has a strong tourism base, the impact of an overheated local economy could be catastrophic long term. The planning strategy must consider how it can retain what is good about the town without losing sight of the need for change. This doesn’t just happen, it has to be planned.

Whatever the shelf life of this driver industry, planning must not only factor in how to accommodate the changes it will bring over the duration, but how the community will cope once it’s gone. When the big guns move on to the next town, as they inevitably do, those left behind want to be able to celebrate the changes they brought, not mourn what might have been.


The rules of attraction

A regional city needs to have a lot going for it to grow in an economically and socially sustainable manner.

Communities populated entirely by miners, for example, are not going to be attractive for a whole lot of other people.

So how do you attract different professionals, particularly those in knowledge intensive industries, to a regional city?

It’s not simply a matter of having the jobs. It requires an understanding of the relationship between economic and population growth and areas such as social amenity planning, land use and spatial planning, transport and utility infrastructure, and environmental sustainability.

A professional earning $100,000-plus a year will be looking for a certain quality of life before considering a move to a regional city. For the city’s planners forging ahead, this requires a big picture approach:

  • What’s the community going to look like?
  • How well is it going to be serviced by infrastructure (not just utilities)?
  • What level of social infrastructure is there?
  • What is the level of cultural planning and infrastructure? 
  • What educational opportunities are there? Will prospective residents need to send the kids away to Perth based schools? Is there a university campus there and, if not, can one be established?

Regional centres such as Karratha have battled severe growing pains because the necessary planning for a certain quality of life for a residential population was not considered at the front end. 

In Broome, the prospect of a gas hub located at James Price Point for the Browse Basin development will, if it proceeds, trigger billion dollars worth of infrastructure investment which will significantly change the nature of that town whether people like it or not.

How will they plan quality of life and amenity issues around a project of such magnitude? What are the transport needs? Can major changes be made in a sustainable fashion? What is the employment profile going to be – fly in/fly out or residential? If it’s the latter, how can changes be made to attract various professions? 

There is an emerging acceptance of the importance of demography, an approach that says: “This is what we want to do and our community will ultimately look very different because we are shifting from a business as usual, incremental population growth model to one of facilitated development.”  It is a model that incorporates:

  • Infrastructure planning
  • Social amenity planning
  • Land use and spatial planning
  • Cultural policy planning
  • Environmental sustainability planning

And it can be applied to any regional city anywhere in Australia. The fundamentals don’t change – graduating from  a large town to a city has to be done in a facilitated way.